What comes next
Quizzes and hub
Nothing this week · the one decision that touches the contract

Where the quizzes live

12,480 questions are in the bank and 11,632 have passed the fact check. They can be read, printed, practiced or sat as a timed paper on the question page. So the material for a quiz exists in small quantity, and the rule holds: nothing goes in front of a student until it has cleared review. The question here is separate: where quizzes would live at all, and a Shopify store is probably not the right home.

A place where students work through material and keep their own progress is a learning site rather than a store page. That is bigger than a product, which is why it needs a decision from you rather than a build from me.

The short version

  • No work planned on this in week 17, and no decision needed yet
  • 11,632 checked questions can be practiced and sat as a timed paper
  • A simple dashboard fits the current contract; the full one does not
  • The question set you found an error in is not corrected yet
Week 16 review What comes next Product images Free resources Blog posts Puzzles Content Automation Quizzes and hub Build ownership

What I propose for now

Enough to show you what it feels like, without committing either of us to the larger build.

1

One page showing a single quiz flow

A student opens it, works through a set, and sees how they did. One subject, one flow, built on questions that have cleared the checks, so it shows the shape without putting an unverified question in front of anyone.

2

Quiz generation wired into the content studio

So new sets can be produced without me in the loop. This is worth doing regardless of where the quizzes end up living.

3

A hold on the rest

The rest wait until you have seen the flow and said where it belongs. Generating thousands of items into the wrong home costs more to undo than to delay.

The quiz flow page is not built yet It comes after the front end work, and it is a small build

The personal dashboard idea

The organizer style you said you liked, turned into something a student logs into.

Why it is worth considering

The kind of thing your competitors do not have. A study organizer that remembers where someone is, holds their material in one place and works through it with them is a different product from a set of downloads.

A simple version of it does not need the contract reopened. It would still be a standout piece of the site.

What makes it expensive

Built from scratch it is a much larger time commitment than adapting the architecture I already have. That difference is the subject of the build ownership page, and it is your call.

The full version, with accounts and paid access, is where the contract structure would need revisiting.

The accuracy problem you found

It belongs on this page because it decides whether any of this is worth building.

You answered question three on the physics interactive and the question was wrong rather than you: aliasing shows as multiple colors rather than just red or blue. You said the questions have to be accurate and not confusing, and that is the standard the work is held to.

That question set has not been corrected yet. It sits as its own piece of work rather than folded into something larger, because a wrong question in a study tool is worse than none at all.

The second half of what you asked for, real ultrasound images inside the questions rather than diagrams, is what the image work on the automation page exists to make possible. That part is close.

Why this one touches the contract

Everything else in this note fits the current arrangement: deliverables on your store, week by week. A site where students log in and work is a different thing to build and maintain, with hosting, accounts and ongoing support attached.

I am not asking for that now. I am flagging it so that the quiz work does not quietly grow into it without either of us noticing. The single quiz flow keeps the option open at almost no cost.

Sitename · project note for week 16 August 19, 2026